Uncategorized

I’ve been thinking a lot about movies lately. Which, okay, is not exactly a rare event for me. Movies are kind of my thing. But lately, when I sit down on the couch, lights low, phone face-down (mostly), I’m noticing that the films hitting me hardest are queer ones. Not just the shiny new releases, but the older stuff too. The scrappy indies. The messy, imperfect stories. The ones that feel like they were made by people who needed to tell them.

And I keep circling back to the same thought: LGBT cinema isn’t just nice to have. It’s necessary. Especially right now.

---

It’s Proof We Exist (And Always Have)

This might sound obvious, but stick with me.

When you grow up queer—especially if you’re a certain age—you don’t see yourself much on screen. Or when you do, it’s tragic, coded, or buried under subtext so thick you need a shovel. So when I first saw characters who loved like I loved, wanted like I wanted, or even just stood in a room like I did, something in my chest loosened.

Movies are receipts. They quietly say, We were here. We are here. No matter how loud the shouting gets in politics or media cycles, those stories remain. Someone pressed record. Someone said, “This matters enough to film.”

That counts for more than people realize.

When the World Gets Loud, Stories Get Louder

Let’s be honest: things feel weird out there. Tense. Side-eye inducing. Every time I scroll the news, it feels like someone, somewhere, is having a strong opinion about queer lives—usually without asking queer people first.

That’s when LGBT films start doing heavy lifting.

They don’t argue. They don’t debate. They just show. A couple cooking dinner. A teen staring at their crush a second too long. An older man remembering a love he wasn’t allowed to keep. These moments sneak past defenses. You don’t have to agree with a policy to feel something when a character hurts or hopes.

I’ve seen straight friends watch queer movies and go quiet afterward. Not because they were preached at, but because they recognized something human. That recognition matters.

Representation Isn’t About Perfection

Here’s my possibly unpopular take: queer cinema doesn’t need to make us look “good.”

Some of my favorite LGBT films feature deeply flawed people. Messy relationships. Bad decisions. Awkward silences. Lives that don’t wrap up neatly.

And thank god for that.

I don’t want saints. I want people. I want characters who screw up, who say the wrong thing, who fall for the wrong person, who still manage to be worthy of love. Straight characters have been allowed to be disasters for a hundred years. We deserve the same grace.

Seeing that onscreen reminds me I don’t need to earn my humanity by being perfect.

It’s a Lifeline for Someone Sitting Alone Right Now

This part always gets me.

Somewhere out there, someone is watching their first queer movie alone. Maybe late at night. Maybe with headphones on so nobody hears. Maybe they typed a title into a search bar with shaky hands.

That movie might not fix their life. It won’t magically make things easy. But it might give them one small, stubborn thought: I’m not broken.

I remember that feeling. That quiet relief. That sense of being seen by strangers who somehow knew exactly how it felt.

Cinema can do that. Books too, obviously—I’m biased—but movies have faces, voices, bodies. They make it real in a different way.

Queer Films Hold History When No One Else Does

A lot of LGBT history didn’t make it into textbooks. It lived in bars, bedrooms, letters, glances. Cinema preserves that. Even fictional stories carry truth about the time they were made.

Watching older queer films feels like listening to elders talk. There’s fear there. Caution. Sometimes joy that feels hard-won. It reminds me that what we have now didn’t appear out of nowhere. People pushed for it. Loved through it. Lost things along the way.

That context matters, especially when it feels like progress can wobble.

Why I Keep Showing Up for These Stories

I write about LGBT cinema because it feeds me. It challenges me. It reminds me who I am when the noise gets loud. Some nights, it’s comfort. Other nights, it’s a quiet punch to the heart. I need both.

These films don’t ask permission to exist. They just do. And every time one gets made, released, streamed, talked about, shared—that’s another little line drawn in the sand.

So yeah, LGBT cinema matters. Not someday. Not theoretically. Right now.

And I’ll keep watching. Writing. Talking about it. Because stories like these kept me company when I needed it most, and I know I’m not the only one.

---

Lucien Knight came to New York to escape scandal.
He found a dead singer, a beautiful liar, and a ghost that won’t let go.
Murder at the Savoy — jazz-soaked noir meets the supernatural.

Grab your copy HERE

So, I’ve been thinking a lot about magic lately. Not the pull-a-bunny-from-a-hat kind, and not the Harry-Potter-got-his-letter kind either. I mean the kind of magic that sneaks into everyday life and turns totally normal situations into philosophical headaches.
You know—Tuesday afternoon moral crises, but with fireballs.

Every time I write something supernatural or wander through a fantasy novel, my brain wanders to the same question: If I had magic, would I actually be a good person?

If I’m being honest, there’s a decent chance I’d use telekinesis to grab the TV remote I dropped on the floor instead of walking three steps to get it. Which… okay, not exactly a moral emergency. But once you start bending the rules of the natural world, everything else starts bending with it.

Let me explain before I lose my remaining credibility.

Magic Makes Temptation Weirdly Convenient

Picture this: you’ve overslept, you’re late for work, your coffee tastes like disappointment… and you know one tiny time-freeze spell would fix everything.

Do you use it?

Part of me is like, “Yes, absolutely, freeze the universe so I can brush my teeth in peace.”
But then the other part chimes in with, “Are you literally manipulating the fabric of reality because you stayed up too late reading paranormal detective fiction again?”

And once you realize you can fix every small annoyance with a spark of magic, the temptation grows.
Traffic jam? Poof—gone.
Laundry? Floats into the washer on its own.
Annoying neighbor? Maybe their TV remote just keeps mysteriously disappearing. (Totally unrelated to my earlier comment. Probably.)

This is where morality starts sliding around like a greased pig.
Magic doesn’t create selfishness—it just hands it a jetpack.

The “Helpful Magic” Conundrum

Then there’s the flip side: using magic to help people.

Sounds noble, right? But then the questions start piling up like mismatched socks.

Let’s say you can see ghosts (hi, Nick Michelson). A spirit shows up crying about unfinished business. You could help… but maybe their unfinished business is deeply personal or dangerous or maybe you’re just trying to enjoy your grilled cheese sandwich without a phantom hovering over you.

Do you owe them your help?

What if you can heal people?
Do you heal everyone?
Do you heal your friends first?
Do you cure your enemies out of compassion or leave them to stew in their bad decisions?

That’s the thing about magic: every “good” act grows fangs once you tug on the threads a little.

I once read a fantasy where the hero could turn back time, but every time he “fixed” something, he made someone else’s life worse without realizing it.
A bit like rearranging your living room furniture only to discover you’ve blocked every power outlet in the house.

Mind Reading? Absolutely Not.

This one always gets my blood pressure going.

Imagine being able to read minds.
On the surface: ooh interesting!
In reality: worst idea ever.

First of all, I do not need to know what the barista thinks of my overly complicated order.
Second, privacy becomes a joke.
Third, how do you even maintain relationships when you accidentally hear someone thinking, “He says he likes this shirt but that color makes him look like a sleepy tangerine”?

And if you can read minds, is it wrong not to warn someone when you hear their date planning to ghost them?
Or do you let fate roll on because meddling feels sketchy?

Magic always gives you new ways to be nosy, which is just… dangerous.

Love Spells: The Biggest Nope in the Universe

There is no moral gray area here. Love spells should be fired into the sun.

If I bake a batch of enchanted cookies that make someone adore me, that’s not romance.
That’s emotional identity theft.

But of course, in magical worlds people always try it anyway. And it always ends like:

• They fall in love with the wrong person
• They fall too hard and become obsessive
• They fall in love with EVERYONE (chaotic, but maybe fun for a minute? An episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer did this)

The point is, free will matters. Magic that messes with hearts is a straight-up moral sinkhole.

Accidental Magic: A Whole Category of Oops

One of my favorite tropes is when someone didn’t mean to do magic but whoops—now the cat talks.

Accidental magic makes everything messy because you didn’t plan to break the rules of existence, but now you’ve got sentient furniture judging your life choices.

Imagine walking through your apartment thinking you’re alone and your bookshelf says, “Really? Another paranormal noir novel? Live a little.”

Now you have to figure out:

• Do you undo it?
• Does the bookshelf WANT you to undo it?
• Are you its legal guardian now???

Morality gets fuzzy fast.

The Big Question

What magic really does is test your character.
It shines a bright, awkward spotlight on the stuff you normally keep tucked away—selfishness, fear, impatience, compassion, guilt, curiosity, all of it.

Magic doesn’t make someone good or bad.
It just removes the limits that usually keep our choices small.

And if I’m being honest, that’s why I love writing about it. Magic isn’t just glitter and glowing symbols—it’s a giant “what if” directed straight at your conscience.

Besides, imagining myself as a wizard who can’t resist magically reheating leftover pizza is far too entertaining.

Thanks for indulging me in this little ethical ramble.
I promise I’m only slightly morally questionable without magic.

---

When impossible sheet music draws Lucien Knight back into the supernatural world he tried to escape, he finds himself investigating haunted musicians, a vanished maestro, and dark secrets buried inside New York’s most prestigious opera house.

Some melodies were never meant to be played. Grab your copy HERE

“We are always the same age inside.” — Richard Stein

Okay, so the first time I heard that quote, I actually laughed out loud… and then immediately felt that tiny sting of recognition, the kind that sneaks in like, Oh. Ohhh. Someone finally said it.

Because here’s the thing I don’t usually admit unless I’m among friends:
my inner age is absolutely, unmistakably sixteen.

Not seventeen.
Not twenty-one.
Not something wise and serene like forty.
Nope—sixteen. A year where everything happened at once, like the universe just dumped a major expansion pack onto my life and said, “Good luck, kid.”

And for whatever reason, inner-me never moved on. He set up camp there. He still wanders around in that version of the world, with his big emotions and bigger dreams and that feeling of being perched right on the edge of everything.

The Sixteen-Year-Old Who Runs the Control Room

I swear this inner teen is still the one pushing buttons in my brain.

He’s the one who gets startled whenever someone addresses me as “sir.” Every time that happens, he perks up like, Who, me? Then looks around for an adult—like an actual adult—because surely the title wasn’t meant for him.

He’s also the one who still believes I can pull off things my present-day knees disagree with. Like climbing up on a chair to change a lightbulb without thinking it through. Then the outside version of me remembers gravity just in time and steps off the chair like I meant to do that.

Sixteen-year-old me is the emotional driver, too. He’s full-volume, very opinionated, and convinced that the world is one big, mysterious invitation. He feels everything like it’s happening right this minute. Joy hits him hard. Music hits him harder. Heartache? Don’t even ask—he still thinks about certain moments like they were yesterday.

That Year That Glued Itself to Me

I’ve spent a lot of time wondering why sixteen stuck instead of some quieter, gentler age.

And honestly, that year just imprinted itself on me.
So much happened—big things, strange things, turning points I didn’t recognize as turning points until way later. Sixteen was the year that rearranged my internal furniture. I didn’t have the words for it back then, but I knew life was shifting underneath my feet.

And somehow, my inner self grabbed onto that age and said, We’ll stay here. This is who we are.

He never moved out. He hangs string lights in the hallways of my memories and occasionally blasts music when I’m trying to sleep.

The Ways My Sixteen-Year-Old Still Shows Up

You know that feeling when you hear a song from that particular era of your life and you’re suddenly right back in those same too-big jeans or that over-washed T-shirt you loved for no reason? Yeah, for me, that happens almost weekly.

Sixteen-year-old me:

• Still thinks he can learn anything overnight. I watch one tutorial and inner-me goes, “We could totally do that.” Outer-me realizes the next morning that… no. No we cannot.
• Shows up every time I write. That blend of hope and fear—of wanting someone to read my words and also wanting to run away if they do—yep, that’s him.
• Panics over new experiences the way you panic before going onstage for the school play, even though present-day me just wants to pick up a prescription or something equally mundane.
• Still gets giddy over holiday decorations. The adult sweeps up the glitter explosion; the sixteen-year-old thinks every ornament is a sign that magic might be real.

And honestly? I kind of adore him for that.

Juggling Inside Age and Outside Age

Life gets interesting when your inside age and outside age don’t line up neatly. The outside version of me is capable of things inner-me couldn’t imagine—like handling paperwork without calling someone for emotional support.

But inside-me is the version who dreams, who remembers, who still feels that electric sense of becoming—even though that word makes me sound like a self-help pamphlet.

He’s the one who nudges me into trying new hobbies I’m probably not ready for. He’s also the one who thinks everyone is basically a potential crush until proven otherwise.

He lives with curiosity. The grown-up version lives with lists.

Put the two together, and I’m… well, me.

Letting Sixteen Stick Around

These days I’ve stopped trying to shake him off or “upgrade” him. Instead, I let him ride shotgun.

He points out things I forget to appreciate.
He reminds me of the kid I was before life got louder.
He keeps things tender, which isn’t always comfortable, but it is honest.

And I think that’s why Stein’s quote hits so hard: the inside age is our truest witness. It’s the version of us that never stopped being real.

My sixteen-year-old self may not pay bills or moisturize or stretch before bending over to pick something up, but he’s the spark that never went out.

And honestly, I like having him around.

---

Would you trust a creature of mud and legend to guard your life? David doesn’t have a choice. Brooklyn is under siege by a man wielding living shadows, and only his impossible clay sentinel stands between survival and ruin. Grab your copy HERE

The Great Vinyl Reversal

So, can we just pause for a second and talk about this wild world we live in? I swear, every time I think I have a handle on pop culture, it does a 180 and leaves me standing here scratching my head. You asked if vinyl records are really, truly making a comeback, and my honest-to-goodness reaction is: Wait, what? Like, I get that everything eventually comes back—hello, low-rise jeans, which I’m still internally screaming about—but records? That’s a format I personally sent off with a little tear and a “see you never” back in the day.

My Personal Media Journey (Vinyl to CD to Cloud)

I had this monster collection, you know? Probably five hundred or more albums stacked up in those flimsy particle-board shelves that always sagged in the middle. The whole ceremony of pulling out the record, dropping the needle, the little crackling sound as the music started—it was a whole thing. But then, the CD arrived. Suddenly, I had these sleek, shiny discs, and I could skip tracks without lifting my entire arm! No dust! No warping! I spent months converting my entire music life, tossing those big, space-sucking vinyls and replacing them with towering, narrow CD racks that I thought were the absolute epitome of organization. I even convinced myself the “perfect digital sound” was better. I had feelings of superiority, I’m not gonna lie, looking at people still messing with their bulky turntables.

And then, as is the way of the universe, CDs became obsolete, too. Next stop: streaming. Instant access to everything, always. My entire music library now lives in a cloud somewhere, existing purely as ones and zeroes. It’s fantastic for convenience, but you’re right, it feels a little… unreal. It’s like owning a postcard of the Mona Lisa instead of the actual painting.

The Streaming Anxiety is Real

I have definitely felt that little clutch of fear when I’m reminded that my 100-hour-long, perfectly curated playlist of obscure 90s indie tracks could vanish overnight because some licensing agreement went sideways. It happens all the time! We spend all this time building these little digital homes for our music, and they are basically built on quicksand. That’s a serious bummer. It’s a very real concern when you don’t actually own the stuff; it just lives on someone else’s server, like a digital houseguest who could be evicted at any moment.

The Return of Physical Media (Both Kinds!)

But now, the pendulum is swinging back! I was looking on Orville Peck’s site recently—you know I love a good fringed mask—and saw that his new album is being released on both vinyl and CD. A double-whammy of physical media nostalgia! I mean, I genuinely didn’t even know you could buy a new record player anymore, let alone that they are apparently being snapped up by a whole new generation who think the “retro-ness” is cool. I guess the whole ceremony of listening is back. It forces you to sit down, look at the giant cover art—which is a form of artwork in itself, let’s be real—and actually listen to the album as a complete piece of work, not just a bunch of songs shuffled around.

Why CDs Are Staging a Coup

And yes, people are buying CDs again! The cost of a new vinyl release can be seriously steep, and honestly, the sheer volume of old CDs floating around means they are ridiculously cheap to pick up secondhand. It’s physical, it’s permanent, and if you’re one of those people who believes the uncompressed sound is superior—and many audiophiles do feel that deep, resonant sound of the CD can’t be matched by streaming—then it’s a total win. Plus, you get those awesome booklets with the lyrics and the thank you notes. It’s a physical memory of the music you love, and I think that’s what we were missing in the age of all-digital, all-the-time. There’s something so satisfying about holding your favorite album in your hands. It connects you to the art in a way tapping a phone screen just doesn’t.

Full Circle and Ready to Spin

So, here we are: after ditching vinyl for CD, and CD for streaming, we are looping back to… owning things! The human desire for a tangible, holdable object, especially when it comes to art, is apparently hard-wired. It makes me feel a little less crazy for still buying actual paper books. I guess I need to start budgeting for a turntable and figuring out where I’m going to put the racks, because this full-circle moment in music history is actually kind of charming.

I’ve been sitting on this for a while, kind of like when you know you’re going to leave someone but you keep waiting for a sign, or a horoscope, or maybe a nudge from the universe. But nothing dramatic happened—no big betrayal, no yelling match—just this steady drip of “ugh, seriously?” every time I opened another New York Times article over the past year. And now here I am, officially canceling my subscription and wandering off with The Guardian like someone craving better company.

The Slow Fade-Out

I’ll be honest: I hung on to the Times longer than I should have. Partly because it’s the Times, and partly because canceling anything online is weirdly annoying. You know those websites that hide the cancellation button like it’s a national security secret? Yeah. That.

But the real issue was the vibe—this persistent smoothing-over of Trump and the general political mess, like everyone should stay calm and treat the whole thing like a mild policy disagreement instead of…well, what it is. Every time they framed something as “unusual behavior” or “unexpected rhetoric,” I’d squint at the screen the same way I look at a bad Yelp review for a restaurant I know is terrible. You know exactly what’s going on—you just don’t trust the wording.

There’s this term people throw around: sane-washing. And wow, did I start noticing it everywhere. It’s like watching someone try to pretty-up a raw onion. Sure, call it “rustic” all you want, but we both know it still stings your eyes.

My Breaking Point Was… Everything

There wasn’t a single moment when I said, “Alright, that’s it.” It was more like a collection of sensory annoyances: the taste of lukewarm coffee while skimming headlines that tiptoed around what should’ve been bold statements; the feeling of my shoulders tensing every time an article gently massaged a political talking point into a bland, palatable lump; the quiet little exhale I’d make whenever I clicked over to The Guardian and felt like I could actually breathe again.

And then there was the bigger thing—the trust piece. Somewhere along the way, I realized I just didn’t trust mainstream outlets anymore. Not for the stuff that actually matters to me. Everything started sounding…polished in a way that makes me suspicious. Like someone dusted the truth with powdered sugar right before handing it over. I don’t need powdered sugar. I want the weird, slightly lumpy batter underneath—the one that hasn’t been smoothed into a PR-friendly pancake.

Why The Guardian Gets to Stay

The Guardian feels like a friend who shows up at your door with takeout and says, “Okay, let’s talk about this mess.” There’s an energy to it that I actually connect with—sharp, but without trying to scare me; grounded, but not resigned; passionate without slipping into ranting uncle territory.

Plus, they’re not afraid to call things what they are. No tiptoeing. No sugar dusting. No “maybe this is perfectly normal if you squint hard enough.” Just actual reporting that doesn’t make me want to roll my eyes so hard I strain something.

And yeah, sometimes I disagree with them—but I trust them more. That says a lot.

My Move to Indie Media

I’ve been drifting toward indie media for a while now, probably the same way people drift toward small cafés when the giant coffee chains start tasting like burnt cardboard. There’s something refreshing about outlets run by actual humans who don’t have eleven layers of corporate varnish over their words.

The voices feel clearer. The motives feel less tangled. And there’s a sincerity there—sometimes messy, sometimes ranty, sometimes oddly charming—that feels more honest than anything I’ve gotten from the mainstream press lately.

It’s like eating vegetables from your neighbor’s garden instead of the supermarket. They may look a little crooked, but at least you know they weren’t grown in a vat under a fluorescent light.

So… Goodbye, Times

I thought I’d feel guilty canceling, but I honestly don’t. I feel kind of…relieved? Like I cleaned out a closet that’s been annoying me forever and finally let go of a jacket I never liked in the first place.

The Guardian stays. Indie media stays. My sanity stays.

The Times goes.

And you know what? I think this is going to be a much healthier year for me—newswise, at least.